• Subject Name : Management

Evaluation Plan for Red Cross Society of Australia

Table of Contents

Project Aim..

Background and context

Literature Review..

Evaluation Methodology

Project Budget and Funding.

Evaluation Timetable.


Reference List

Project Aim

Australian Red Cross Society’s worth is judged as in the form of a main objective associated with this evaluation. The end associated with these activities is focused on the outcome in the direction of providing aid to the future program as well as its similar projects. The objectives associated with this evaluation will lead to below-mentioned following points (Price et al., 2016):

  • To establish if the Australian Red Cross Society should continue its programs and activities
  • To determine if the program should continue its operations in its entirety
  • To establish if it possible to implement these programs in other places

Essentially, all these objectives combine to help the Australian Red Cross Society in the direction of improving its program to meet the objectives initially.

Research questions

  • Did South Australian community-based individuals experience changes in terms of their health?
  • Did the programs are instrumental in enhancing the aboriginal's well-being associated with the vulnerable persons, violence and abuse victims, elderly, as well as the community members?
  • What changed the aboriginals in terms of addressing the needs of the persons with vulnerability, senior citizens, violence victims, or the abused?
  • What are the organizational expectations of these programs?

Background and Context

The Australian Red Cross Society is a non-profit organization established in 1914. The organization volunteers its mission in the direction of enhancing vulnerable person’s lives. It is through humanity’s mobilization power associated with the societies of Australia that came across the globe. The Australian Red Cross Society offers disaster relief services (edcross.org.au, 2020). It is based on humanitarian grounds for the public. It is through organizational disaster, social services based safety, as well as toward communal healthcare. The program is instrumental in involving volunteering provisional aid across different fields that include disaster management, safety and prevention care, communal healthcare as well as the aspect of international wellbeing operations. In addition to it, the Australian Red Cross Society involve in emergencies and concurrent Australian aboriginal community-based individuals based on partnerships associated with humanitarian as well as academic resources (Langton & West, 2016).

The Red Cross Society of Australia based on the theory of change that involves both individuals as well as change theory focusing on helping individual systems based community by fostering collaboration with institutions. It works to change the vulnerable persons by providing direct aids to such individuals. The working is carried out in the direction of changing systems so that one can address the needs as well as the vulnerable community’s concerns. The program emphasizes its commitment, expertise, courage, as well as generosity in the direction of aiding people when the change tends to occur spontaneously. Australian change theory includes network of strong institutions relationships, with diverse community engagement as well as towards the strong volunteer base cultivation by adapting with change flexibility as per the societal needs (Storry et al., 2016). 

It focuses internationally on the organizational change theory and its guidelines toward becoming a global institutional partnership with other organizations. It is in the direction of delivering a comprehensive aid that provides immediate and continuous relief through their respective activities. The Red Cross Society of Australia tends to focus on innovative development (Langton & West, 2016). It is by strengthening national societal capacity to gain preparedness toward disasters. They foster resilience among communities offering aid for disaster, conflict, or peoples affected by adversity. Change is created to improve long-term life facilitates those are desired toward the availing of assistance based outcomes associated with the individual need (Mohajan et al., 2018). . 

Literature Review of Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation

According to Abadie & Cattaneo (2018), evaluation is a systematic inquiry answering procedure that works well. It discusses the scope of improving the project; the best way of meeting community needs to establish right kind of goal-reaching program. The authors evaluate non-profit programs to inform decision-making by ensuring the correct goals according to the set priorities to improve program’s design implementation. It also develops knowledge-based skills by increasing the participant’s need and their understanding of the increased effective practices knowledge of building as per the capacity of the organization. 

Social changes are influenced by allowing diverse perspectives exploration, instrumental in shaping public opinion to develop and share the evidence. Mitchell & Berlan (2018), refer to community-based evaluation programs that increase collaboration through improving communication, and by building confidence to develop common understanding all across the partnerships based within organizations. Abadie & Cattaneo (2018) added by supporting teh context considering success evaluation tools that clarify the evaluation needs of the primary audience, the context according to the knowledge sharing enhances evaluation credibility for the trusted. The study evaluates questions based on non-profit program categorizes relevance, implementation, outcomes, efficiency, as well as sustainability. 

Grizzleavva & Sloan (2016) understand the role as well as the program’s capacity for evaluation from the non-profits leader’s view. The study establishes program evaluation with its 8 roles like influential program’s assessment, organizational learning advancement, financing collaboration’s cultivation, decision making based on program management appraisal, as well as stakeholder communication enhancement. Grizzleavva & Sloan (2016), confirming the fact agrees that evaluation aids in facilitating quality assurance, resource allotment determination, as well as organizational credibility validation. Ultimately, there is a fundamental basis for establishing how to improve the effectiveness of the literature programs presented in the evaluation of humanitarian/nonprofit organizations. It is therefore predicted in the form of values associated with all evaluation activities. An assessment is made in the form of an estimate. Additionally, the assessments seek to reflect grant responses without conflict and should be objective and unbiased, but should not be a scientific study, audit, or observation, merely providing practical guidance for future initiatives. Amongst this, study is necessary for the direction of conducting a program evaluation that includes enough time, adequate finances, as well as positive cultural attitude. It also includes the working program evaluation methodologies as well as designs, human resources presence, with attainable expectations (Coleborne, 2017). 

Evaluation Methodology of Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation

Research Design

The researcher would apply the descriptive research design in the direction of assessing the research-based project. It is the evaluation plan that is based on the Australian Red Cross Society and in context to this a descriptive research design is used by the researcher. The researcher is instrumental in accommodating accurate information utilizing a data collection process. It is referring to the descriptive research design that portrays web mining in regards to AI applied to engage them. The exploratory as well as explanatory designs wouldn’t be suitable. They value answering the involved practices. Additionally, the utilized descriptive research design is for quantitative research process in which the researcher collects reliable respondent’s information. On the other hand, the researcher might utilize the explanatory research design as this research project includes a mixed methodology and explores secondary information. This explanatory research design is considered important to select a proper research design. The researcher is unable to formulate an effective paper of research (Mohajan et al., 2018).

Quantitative Research

The evaluation plan that is based on the Australian Red Cross Society is inferred by the research method that is instrumental in resolving as well as describing the problems associated with the use of numbers. Besides, the emphasis is sited on the collection of mathematical data, the summary of those data as well as the illustration of inferences from the data. Along with that, the research methodology features estimates researcher’s purpose to create an evaluation plan that is based on the Australian Red Cross Society by the implementation of mathematical analysis of collected statistical data (Mohajan, 2018). The utilization of questionnaires, as well as widespread surveys as contextual statistical information, are used before the use of computer technology. In conjunction with this, describing specified sensation, this research emphasizes data collection along with the simplification process of cross-cutting all across the respondent's group. This research method incorporates the foundation of the formalized effective guidelines of research process structure, from preparing research design for research questions, by the analysis of collected information to interpret and draw a reasonable conclusion. In addition to it, all the information associates with factors that are clear and are used considering them as an identical data collection method. Numerical structure based factors with materialistic information presented in graphical forms, with data tables used to draw statistical measurements, like variance, correlations, as well as averages. These details are further analyzed using analyzing factors in the form of a variance analysis or regression analysis carrying out of a detailed evaluation of the Australian Red Cross Society (Price et al., 2016).

 Survey tool

There are a lot of Survey tools in the market however; it depends on the survey to create an evaluation plan that is based on the Australian Red Cross Society. It refers to the selection of right kind of survey tool that may be used. For this study, Survey Monkey will be subjected. General public and customer’s based surveys are collected through feedback, opinions, criticism as well as suggestions. Using online survey software creates professional online surveys that are powerful and are well known online application (Mau, 2017).

 Structured observations

Structured observation or systemic observation refers to a data collection method in which researchers collect data without directly involving participants (researchers view from a distance) and the detailed strategy is somehow well-structured and well-defined and systematic. To create an evaluation plan based on the Australian Red Cross Society that prohibits researchers from collecting information. This cannot be submitted using qualitative research methods such as surveys as well as interviews by using a coding method.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data collection to create an evaluation plan that is based on the Australian Red Cross Society collects significant facts from appropriate sources. It is directed to the isolating research response and problems that visualize the hypothesis. This determines the outcome's extent. The data collection method is of 2 submissions, the primary and the secondary data collection method. Primary data collection as in context to this paper will collect quantitative data depending on individual design's numbers. Besides, the data collection method this data includes questions based on correlation and regression questions, averages, medians, and many more. It's affordable for a short time use as due to the unusual quantitative method's control, an identification test can be created. The evaluation plan analysis that is based on the Australian Red Cross Society will be subjected through a Software (SPSS). A comprehensive, as well as flexible statistical analysis associated with the data management tool, is one of the most popular statistical packages that can perform complex data manipulation. It is designed for both the analysis and interaction with non-interactive users with ease (Basias & Pollalis, 2018).

Project Budget and Funding

Type of Expenditure





20 evaluators


The hourly rate $30. working 5 hours/day for 30days earning $12,500 per evaluator

Materials and Supplies

Stationery, postage, and meals for team meetings


Meals costing $5,000 for all stakeholders

Supplies with postage costing $5,000


Computers as well as software-based audio recorders


Computers, software, including audio recorders that spare all evaluators


Pre-evaluation meeting, mid-evaluation meeting, follow-up meetings, kick-off meetings, and field travels


Manitoba province cover wide area

Total Amounts



Reflects current amount as of December 2020

The program will have 20 staff, paid $30 per hour working 5 hours a day for 30 days bringing it to a total of $12,500 per evaluator, and $250,000 for all evaluators. The evaluation process requires materials supplies including stationery meals for the team meetings which will cost $10,000 for the entire period. There will be a computer, software, and audio recorders with 2 spares and these will cost $11,000. Since South Australia is a wide area, there will be associated travel costs for the meetings and field visits across the entire evaluation period. Thus, the budget will be $281,000.

Evaluation Timetable

The evaluation team will also be given the target dates for the milestones.

The structure of the inception report will be as follows:


Objectives, background, context, and scope of evaluation


Criterion, questions, concepts, data collection tools, analytic approaches, risks, and predicted limitations

Program of work

Stages of the evaluation, team structure and roles, management and logistics, schedules


Outline of the main report, details of the roles of team members, program lists, a detailed workplan

The timeframe for the evaluation will be 2 months. The timeframe is presented in the table below:



Time Allocated

Observation of the program and recruitment of evaluators

An evaluation team

2 weeks

Kick-off meetings and initial briefings

Inception report

1 week

Documentation review and consultations amongst stakeholders

Draft summative evaluation report

4 weeks

Field/on-site visits

Interviews focus groups, surveys

Data analysis debriefs, and presentation of the drafts

Validation meetings

Completion of the evaluation reports that incorporates more comments given by key informants, stakeholders, and submissions to the main evaluators. Contains conclusions and recommendations

Final summative evaluation report

2 weeks

Total working period

Entire Evaluation

6 weeks = 2 months

Conclusion on Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation

It will be good to conclude that this evaluation purposes to be summative by impacting it by focusing on effectiveness achievements by Australian Red Cross Society programs. Due to many programs or interventions, this organization evaluates the program focussing on the South Australian organization’s programs. This province provides programs and services that reach out and serve the local communities. These include a wide range of aboriginal support services, as well as communities that support housing services. A contextual methodology is included to understand and analyze the important aspects associated with this topic of Evaluation Plan for the Red Cross Society of Australia. The effects of the organizational project are based on the aspect of enhancing networking as well as partnerships. Conclusively it has been stated that the Australian Red Cross Society instrumental in identifying the situational circumstances in the direction of establishing participant’s relationships. The budget has also been estimated to $281,000.

Reference List for Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation

Abadie, A., & Cattaneo, M. D. (2018). Econometric methods for program evaluation. Annual Review of Economics, 10, 465-503.

Basias, N., & Pollalis, Y. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 91-105.

Coleborne, C. (2017). The Power of Humanity: 100 Years of Australian Red Cross, 1914–2014.

edcross.org.au (2020), The Power of Humanity, from: https://www.redcross.org.au/ [Retrieved On:19th October 2020]

Grizzle, C., & Sloan, M. F. (2016). Assessing changing accountability structures created by emerging equity markets in the nonprofit sector. Public Administration Quarterly, 387-408.

Langton, J., & West, B. (2016). One hundred years of annual reporting by the Australian Red Cross: Building public trust and approbation through emotive disclosures. Accounting History, 21(2-3), 185-207.

Mau, V. (2017). Mobilising the Movement: Australian Red Cross, migration, and the role of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement around humanitarian response. International Review of the Red Cross, 99(904), 31-42.

Mitchell, G. E., & Berlan, D. (2018). Evaluation in nonprofit organizations: An empirical analysis. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 415-437.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48..

Price, C., Goodson, B., Wolf, A., & Boulay, B. (2016). Evaluation plan template. Abt Associates.

Storry, J. R., Castilho, L., Chen, Q., Daniels, G., Denomme, G., Flegel, W. A., ... & Lomas‐Francis, C. (2016). International society of blood transfusion working party on red cell immunogenetics and terminology: report of the Seoul and London meetings. ISBT science series, 11(2), 118-122.

Remember, at the center of any academic work, lies clarity and evidence. Should you need further assistance, do look up to our Management Assignment Help

Get It Done! Today

Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
Upload your assignment
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts


  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

  • Total

  • Let's Start

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore MASS
Order Now

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help