Sustainability Accounting's Impact on Food Companies' Finances - Assessment Answer

Background

Sustainability is an evolving interdisciplinary area of study, thoroughly linked with the economic impacts of ecological issues for distinct firms and businesses and the requirement of evolution to a justifiable economy. There is no refuting the fact that the practices of sustainable growth have activated a transformation in a broad array of industries (Sachs et al. 2019). In this relation, several corporations are already conscious of the importance of recent tendencies and are practising go-green representations of business with united business social responsibilities while huge, more advanced firms are stirring towards the creation of eco-friendly goods to fulfil social demands. Sustainability accounting depicts the activities that have a direct influence on the ecological, social and economic performance of the corporation (Calabrese et al. 2019). It is regarded as the sub-category of financial bookkeeping that lay emphasis on the revelation of non-financial data concerning the performance of the firm to exterior participants like creditors, capital holders and other authorities.

Corporations might have a broad array of motives to perform sustainability reporting – however, the major incentive is often the public concern in regard to the impact of industrial activities and the economic progress on the natural environment and society and the rising expectations from the stakeholders to make the issuance of such reports (Horisch et al. 2020). Yet, reporting practices in the food sector are only still emerging and study in this area is still scarce.

This paper will aim at assessing the effect of sustainable accounting on the financial performance of corporations operating in the food sector.

Research Problem

The major issue concerned with sustainable accounting is that there is a lack of implementation with very a smaller number of organizations having sustainability strategies. With the aid of sustainable accounting, firms can make capital investments. However, pouring sustainability in the firm has challenges, including a weak obligation from the board, a lower level of accountability, talent gaps and a sustainability team without the power to execute initiatives (Aguilera et al. 2021). Majorly, companies are not aware about the fact that sustainable accounting may have a positive influence on their overall financial performance. For many years, responding towards ecological issues has always been a no-win proposal for firms. Now, in this environmental setting, both the environment and the firms can be winning. In other words, going green is no lengthier a hurdle to doing business, as it is a substance for innovation and renovation, wealth maximization and new market opportunities.

Effective or inefficient financial presentation can be looked from the financial declarations. However, only looking at the financial statement is not sufficient to justify the overall performance of the company. Companies are required to use sustainability accounting to detail the imprint of the accountability for the economy, environment and social so that the corporation can be well-accepted by community (Aggarwal and Singh 2019).

The sustainable behaviour of corporations is progressively coming under the inspection of governments, customers and NGOs. Failure to familiarize to the new necessities of sustainability is probable to do corporations harm for a longer period, whereas sustainable practices can improve the financial performance of the companies, consumer retention and reputation (Osterblom et al. 2022).

Research Questions

What is the impact of economic performance disclosure on the financial performance of food companies?

What is the impact of social performance disclosure on the financial performance of food companies?

What is the impact of ecological performance disclosure on the financial performance of food companies?

Research Objectives

The purposes of the research study are –

To study the impact of economic performance revelation on the financial performance of the firms.

To study the impact of social performance disclosure on the financial performance of the firms.

To study the effect of ecological performance revelation on the financial performance of the companies.

Relevance

Sustainability accounting is becoming highly accepted and in various sectors, compulsory. In the business world, the accounting teams are uniquely placed to transform abstract concepts like sustainability objectives, into numbers that decision-makers can digest. For any financial arm, the long-term benefits of sustainability accounting are evident. There are three major extents of sustainability – economic, social and ecological. The food industry is a substantial part of any economy. Moreover, the food industry act as the key to the quality of life – in terms of livelihood, utilities, etc. and thus has a significant opportunity for the sector to positively impact the local communities, and employees and enhance the surrounding setting in which it transmits out its operations (Kaur and Garg 2019). Sustainability accounting offers a beneficial tool to determine, assess and accomplish social and ecological risks by determining resource competence and cost savings and associating improvements in environmental and social matters with financial opportunities (Beske et al. 2020). Also, it enables comparison and benchmarking of performance and recognition of finest practices.

The efforts to lessen the information irregularity and to enhance the engagement of stakeholders and associations have been directed to discuss the accountability and credibility of financial material (Romito and Vurro 2021). Thus, there is a need to research the creditability and the excellence of the financial reporting systems of the corporation for two major motives. Firstly, the excellence of outdated accounting data has been described in relation to financial reporting structures and regularly measured via financial pointers. Secondly, non-financial data has acquired eminence and participants and potential depositors have been encompassed as new counterparts together with stockholders and current stockholders for business infrastructures and relations (Taliento et al. 2019).

If the corporation has the desire to uphold its survival, it must pay consideration to '3P'. In other terms, besides chasing profits, the corporation must also pay due consideration to and involve itself in the fulfilment of the welfare of people and make an active contribution to preserving the planet. On the basis of legitimacy theory, inspiring corporations to make sure that their performance and activities are adequate to society. Corporations make use of sustainability accounting to detail the imprint of accountability for the economy, environment and social so that the corporation can be recognized by society (Martins et al. 2020). The corporation must not just operate for its own benefit but also for the advantage of stakeholders. So, it will enhance the image of the corporation and also will enhance the financial performance.

Theoretical Foundation

Legitimacy theory provides a mechanism for gaining an understanding of the environmental and social revelations made by corporations. Legitimacy philosophy is the philosophy that presumes that corporations are making efforts to ensure that the processes they carry out are already under prevailing social norms and rules (Crossley et al. 2021). When stakeholders realize that the corporation functions for the value scheme corresponding with the value scheme of the community itself so corporation will endure its presence. The corporation makes use of sustainability accounting to detail the imprint of accountability for society, the economy and the situation so that the corporation is recognized by community. With due acceptance of society, the corporation is assumed to enhance its performance and also it will raise the profitability of the company.

Stakeholder theory is the philosophy that details for which every corporation is responsible. It presumes that the corporation is not an entity that carries out operations just for the advantage of the stockholders but should also offer benefits to the participants. By revealing the sustainability accounting or reporting, the corporation makes disclosure of both the non-financial information and financial material, allowing the corporation to more visibly interconnect with the public regarding their corporate operations in relation to non-financial administration and performance factors (Jones and Harrison 2019).

Institutional theory lay emphasis on the role of schemes in impacting the social, ecological and economic performance of the corporation. This signifies that supervisory agencies, governments and societal institutes inspire corporations towards the acquisition of the sustainability practices and exposé meant for sustainability (Baah et al. 2021). Signal theory lay emphasis on the voluntary discovery of the sustainability performance material to eradicate the asymmetry of information that rises between company stakeholders and management. It has been mentioned that inclusive revelation of social, environmental and economic performance signifies that there is an upper-level obligation from corporations to the sustainability of participants (Koh et al. 2022). The efficiency of the signal itself relies on the excellence and level of data being revealed in the sustainability statement.

Literature Review

Earlier literature has majorly detailed the notions and descriptions of sustainability accounting, financial performance and corporate social responsibility, but as such there is no consensus. The failure or success of the corporations in the circumstances of the justifiable economy is impacted by the accuracies wherein their CSR is demonstrated (Oncioiu et al. 2020). It depicts the directions wherein the accessible resources are organized under conditions of provincial and national ecological regulations.

Responsibility revelation of the corporation is extremely important for executing government guidelines and community demands in relation to the sustainability revelation of the corporation in terms of social, ecological and economic that have a huge impact on the performance of the corporation in relation to both non-financial and financial performance (Wahyuningtyas et al. 2022). By making disclosure of sustainability accounting and reporting, the corporation discloses the non-financial and financial information, allowing the corporations to more evidently connect with the public regarding their business operations in relation to non-financial administration and performance facets (Caputo et al. 2021).

It has been argued that the material in sustainability statements is distinct dependent on the form of participant, and impacts specific happenings or their performance. Both theorists and practitioners settle that the corporations involved in CSR actions and choose what actions they will involve in the future of sustainability accounting, in order to raise their financial performance and reputation (Clarissa and Rasmini 2018). In the study being carried out by Romanian listed corporations, it has been found that there is an optimistic impact of ecological and social shields on the long-term fiscal performance of registered corporations. There intends to be a positive effect of the sustainability statement directory on share value while making disclosure of information via financial reporting (Belenesi et al. 2021).

To raise the value for corporations, concentration on the revelation of non-financial data has fledged on the grounds of organizational strategies and corporate models. Several exploration studies have suggested that corporations undertake movements leading to the union around the set of CSR reporting tools that support the movements allowing the firms to raise efficiency and fetch value (Ikram et al. 2019). The association between business sustainability reporting and financial presentation is not direct. At one place, the exclusive CSR initiatives of the company can be observed as a deviation from the objective of optimizing the wealth of shareholders. Whereas, business sustainability can undertake a major role in extenuating risk, stopping the externalities of negligent acts of the company to community from arriving back to it in the context of obvious costs (Erawati et al. 2021). In addition, CSR can signal corporate operations to externals. This indicates that initiatives related to CSR can be neutrally, certainly or even undesirably linked with financial performance. In precise terms, sustainability accounting is an important instrument for the long-term accomplishment of the company, directly associated with the social, environmental and economic performance along with the adequate usage of reporting tools and CSR constitute to improve the value of shareholders (Mio et al. 2022).

The relationship between firm profitability and CSR has produced varying outcomes, offering no decisive evidence of whether the association is positive, undesirable or neutral. Despite the fact that writing on environmental and social performance is a volunteer measure, it has been inferred that returns to the portfolios comprising of the securities of only companies that disclosed societal performance information were desirable in comparison to those non-disclosing companies (Whetman 2018). Their findings signified that social revelation has material information and that the market appreciates such kind of disclosure definitely. In addition, studying the influence of pollution control expenditure revelations on the stock market, it has been found that the corporations that made disclosure regarding their pollution control expenses show a temporary but significant rise in the performance of the stock market after disclosure (Chiu et al. 2020). All these findings indicate that the management must allocate some part of their possessions towards writing on their efforts to lessen the dreadful effects of their business processes.

As per the research conducted on the influence of sustainability performance on fiscal performance, it has been found that the current situation of development and progress is focused towards sustainable progress. It can be supportable only when it does not lay emphasis on profit enlargement at any charge but also optimizes the interest and value accumulation of numerous participants by not impacting the natural resources and the environment. The outcomes of the study indicated that there is a substantial negative association between return on possessions and ROCE with the environmental score. In distinction to this, only the social grades indicates a substantial undesirable relation with yield on equity (Jyoti and Khanna 2021).

In another research study, it has been indicated that sustainability reporting can be immensely advantageous as a substitute for improving the profitability of the firm where there is a lack of substantial institutional ownership. It has a substantial impact on the profitability of the company in the short-term, though, one size does not appropriate for all. The findings have suggested that by involving in sustainability reporting, companies having lesser institutional ownership indicate substantial enhancements in financial performance (Park and Jang 2021). For corporations in which there is absence of a huge quantity of recognized ownership and are not essentially inspired to pursue lively part in the company, it would be assumed that they do not apply much impact on corporate governance. Involving sustainability accounting for such companies would demonstrate to be fairly advantageous in grasping a rise in profitability, enabling them an alternative measure or approach to possibly obtain large gains to raise shareholder worth when there is a non-appearance of recognized ownership.

Sustainability reporting has a robust internal and external impact. Combining the non-financial and fiscal aspects within a similar examination can be effective for better evaluation of the viability of the corporation (Baumuller and Sopp 2022). There is a huge significance in assuming sustainable policies and purposes for firms, escalating the opinions of stakeholder clusters while determining to reassess the sustainability reporting, training of employees and the demarcation of responsible clusters in their enlisting, but also the advantages practiced from reporting procedure. As an outcome of this, sustainability accounting becomes, a tool to indorse the business organization on one hand, and on other, as a source of available information to customers, potential and real stockholders, and other concerned parties regarding the actual effect of the action of the organization on environment and society (Oncioiu et al. 2020). It has also been analyzed that by means of CSR reporting at the organizational level can enhance their fiscal performance and it aids both varied participants and administration in regard to the decisions and environmental regulations (Mohammadi and Saeidi 2022).

Conceptualization of Key Terms

Sustainability accounting is the intended revelation of information in regard to the operational environmental and social actions aimed at participants and the overall public – the plan for which is either directed by the standards established by the external company or by the guidelines developed internally (Petcharat and Zaman 2019). These reports are accessible to the public and articulate in what way business sustainability issues are addressed, including the issues like usage of energy, recycling efforts and carbon emissions. This report comprises of aspects – monetary performance revelation, ecological performance revelation and community performance revelation.

Financial performance is considered as the explanation of the financial state of the corporation during the period concerned with fundraising and fund disbursement features, as measured by the liquidity, capital treatment and profitability pointers (Njue 2020). The fiscal performance can be depicted through the examination of the financial proportions of the corporation and one of the substantial measurements of fiscal performance is profitability.

Corporate social responsibility is a form of self-regulation that depicts the accountability and the obligation of the corporate to make an involvement towards the welfare of society and communities via numerous social and ecological procedures (Sharma et al. 2023). It undertakes a vital role in the corporation's brand insight, appeal to employees, consumers, and stockholders, talent withholding and complete success of the business.

References

Aggarwal, P. and Singh, A.K., 2019. CSR and sustainability reporting practices in India: An in-depth content analysis of top-listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(8), pp.1033-1053.

Aguilera, R.V., Aragón-Correa, J.A., Marano, V. and Tashman, P.A., 2021. The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), pp.1468-1497.

Baah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I.S.K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Faibil, D. and Abdoulaye, F.A.M., 2021. Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, pp.100-114.

Baumüller, J. and Sopp, K., 2022. Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), pp.8-28.

Beleneși, M., Bogdan, V. and Popa, D.N., 2021. Disclosure dynamics and non-financial reporting analysis. The case of Romanian listed companies. Sustainability, 13(9), p.4732.

Beske, F., Haustein, E. and Lorson, P.C., 2020. Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), pp.162-186.

Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi Ghiron, N. and Menichini, T., 2019. Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: A tool for directing corporate sustainability towards emerging economic, environmental and social opportunities. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(5), pp.1016-1038.

Caputo, F., Pizzi, S., Ligorio, L. and Leopizzi, R., 2021. Enhancing environmental information transparency through corporate social responsibility reporting regulation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp.3470-3484.

Chiu, C.L., Zhang, J., Li, M., Wei, S., Xu, S. and Chai, X., 2020. A study of environmental disclosure practices in the Chinese energy industry. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), pp.1-21.

Clarissa, S.V. and Rasmini, N.K., 2018. The effect of sustainability report on financial performance with good corporate governance quality as a moderating variable. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 40(2), pp.139-149.

Crossley, R.M., Elmagrhi, M.H. and Ntim, C.G., 2021. Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp.3740-3762.

ERAWATI, N.M.A., HARIADI, B. and SARASWATI, E., 2021. The role of corporate social responsibility in investment efficiency: is it important? The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), pp.169-178.

Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S. and Freeman, R.E., 2020. Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, p.124097.

Ikram, M., Sroufe, R., Mohsin, M., Solangi, Y.A., Shah, S.Z.A. and Shahzad, F., 2019. Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(1), pp.27-53.

Jones, T.M. and Harrison, J.S., 2019. Sustainable wealth creation: Applying instrumental stakeholder theory to the improvement of social welfare.

Jyoti, G. and Khanna, A., 2021. Does sustainability performance impact financial performance? Evidence from Indian service sector firms. Sustainable Development, 29(6), pp.1086-1095.

Kaur, H. and Garg, P., 2019. Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. Journal of cleaner production, 210, pp.146-158.

Koh, K., Li, H. and Tong, Y.H., 2022. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from the quantity and quality of CSR disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

Martins, A., Gomes, D. and Branco, M.C., 2020. Managing corporate social and environmental disclosure: An accountability vs. impression management framework. Sustainability, 13(1), p.296.

Mio, C., Costantini, A. and Panfilo, S., 2022. Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 29(2), pp.367-384.

Mohammadi, S. and Saeidi, H., 2022. Corporate social responsibility and financial accounting concepts: Evidence from an emerging market. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.

Njue, A., 2020. Liquidity Management and Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Embu).

Oncioiu, I., Petrescu, A.G., Bîlcan, F.R., Petrescu, M., Popescu, D.M. and Anghel, E., 2020. Corporate sustainability reporting and financial performance. Sustainability, 12(10), p.4297.

Österblom, H., Bebbington, J., Blasiak, R., Sobkowiak, M. and Folke, C., 2022. Transnational corporations, biosphere stewardship, and sustainable futures. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, pp.609-635.

Park, S.R. and Jang, J.Y., 2021. The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), p.48.

Petcharat, N. and Zaman, M., 2019. Sustainability reporting and integrated reporting perspectives of Thai-listed companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.

Romito, S. and Vurro, C., 2021. Non‐financial disclosure and information asymmetry: A stakeholder view on US listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), pp.595-605.

Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N. and Rockström, J., 2019. Six Transformations to achieve sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), pp.805-814.

Sharma, A., Choudhury, M., Agarwal, S., Sharma, R. and Sharma, R., 2023. Corporate Social Responsibility and Roles of Developers for Sustainability in Companies. In The Route Towards Global Sustainability: Challenges and Management Practices (pp. 313-332). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Taliento, M., Favino, C. and Netti, A., 2019. Impact of environmental, social, and governance information on economic performance: Evidence of a corporate ‘sustainability advantage from Europe'. Sustainability, 11(6), p.1738.

Wahyuningtyas, E.T., Susesti, D.A. and Murtadho, M., 2022, January. Does sustainability reporting improve financial and non-financial performance in Indonesia Companies? In International Conference on Sustainable Innovation Track Accounting and Management Sciences (ICOSIAMS 2021) (pp. 242-246). Atlantis Press.

Whetman, L.L., 2018. The impact of sustainability reporting on firm profitability. Undergraduate Economic Review, 14(1), p.4.

You Might Also Like:

ACCT19082 Financial Accounting Theory Assignment Help

What are the 6 Principles of Financial Management?

Company Annual Report: Four Key Financial Statements Assessment Answer

Looking For Complete Assignment Sample Get It On WhatsApp