Social Cash Transfers and Gender Dynamics in Zambia: Assessment answers

1. Introduction

To combat poverty and advance social protection, social cash transfers have been put into place in a number of nations (Handa et al. 2016). Since its inception in 2003, Zambia's social cash transfer program has been growing to include more vulnerable households. The Social Cash Transfer Factsheet 2022 published by UNICEF claims that the program has been effective in lowering poverty and enhancing access to necessities like education and healthcare (UNICEF 2022). Gender dynamics refers to how men and women hold power in society and how this power affects how people access resources and make decisions. Gender dynamics have a significant impact on whether social cash transfer programs are successful or unsuccessful. Given that they are frequently the primary carers in households, women are more likely to be recipients of these programs (Dake et al. 2018). This can have an impact on their social standing and relationships with other family members because they will be under more pressure and duty to manage the money. Contrarily, men can feel threatened by women's increased access to resources, which could cause conflict and tension in families (UNICEF 2022).

To guarantee that the program serves men and women equally, it is crucial to comprehend how Zambia's social cash transfer program affects gender dynamics in that country. Research on the effects of social cash transfers on gender dynamics in Zambian communities is, however, scarce (Michelo 2015). By examining the effects of social cash transfers on gender relations within households and communities in Zambia, this proposal seeks to close this information gap. The study will offer suggestions for improving the program's conception and execution to advance social inclusion and gender equality. Thus, the initiative can aid in reducing poverty and fostering sustainable development in Zambia.

1.1 Statement of the problem

In Zambia, the social cash transfer program has been effective in decreasing poverty and enhancing access to necessities like healthcare and education. However, there is little research on how the program affects gender dynamics in the community. As already discussed above, to guarantee that the program serves men and women equally, it is crucial to comprehend how social cash transfers affect gender dynamics (De Hoop et al. 2020). The problem statement is regarding the influence of social cash transfers on gender dynamics in Zambian communities and how can the program be better structured and implemented to advance gender equality and social inclusion.

1.2 Rationale for the study

This study will examine the effect of social cash transfers on community gender dynamics in Zambia. The results of this study will help policymakers, program administrators, and development professionals better understand the gender dynamics of Zambia's social cash transfer programs and how to make sure that they support social inclusion and equality (UNICEF 2022).

1.3 Main Research Objective

To examine the impact of social cash transfer on community gender dynamics in Zambia, with a focus on the social, economic, political, and environmental aspects affecting the target groups (Doody and Bailey 2016).

1.3.1 Sub-Research Objectives

1. To identify the demographic characteristics of the social cash transfer recipients in Zambia, including age, gender, education level, and household composition.
2. To assess the extent to which social cash transfer has contributed to poverty reduction and increased economic empowerment among female-headed households in Zambia (Milner et al. 2018).
3. To examine the impact of social cash transfer on gender dynamics in community decision-making processes and the distribution of power between men and women in Zambia.
4. To evaluate the effects of social cash transfers on children's access to education and healthcare services, particularly for girls, in Zambia (Doody and Bailey 2016).
5. To investigate the social and environmental impacts of social cash transfer on community well-being and resilience, including the reduction of social exclusion and the promotion of sustainable livelihoods.
6. To identify the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of social cash transfer programs in Zambia and provide recommendations for policy improvements.

By addressing these research goals, the proposed study seeks to advance knowledge of how social cash transfers affect gender dynamics in Zambian communities and offer evidence-based suggestions for policymakers and practitioners to enhance the efficiency of social protection programs in combating poverty and advancing gender equality (Doody and Bailey 2016).

1.4 Main Research Question

The main research question is, “What is the impact of social cash transfer on community gender dynamics in Zambia, in terms of the social, economic, political, and environmental aspects affecting the target groups?”

1.4.1 Sub-Research Questions

1. What are the demographic characteristics of social cash transfer recipients in Zambia, including age, gender, education level, and household composition?
2. What is the extent to which social cash transfer has contributed to poverty reduction and increased economic empowerment among female-headed households in Zambia?
3. How does social cash transfer affect gender dynamics in community decision-making processes and the distribution of power between men and women in Zambia? (Peters et al. 2013).
4. What is the effect of social cash transfer on children's access to education and healthcare services, particularly for girls, in Zambia?
5. What are the social and environmental impacts of social cash transfer on community well-being and resilience, including the reduction of social exclusion and the promotion of sustainable livelihoods? (Peters et al. 2013).
6. What are the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of social cash transfer programs in Zambia, and how can policy improvements be made to address them?

The study aims to provide a thorough understanding of the impact of social cash transfer on community gender dynamics in Zambia, including the ways in which it impacts the target groups' lives in terms of their social, economic, political, and environmental well-being (UNICEF 2022). This is done by addressing the sub-research questions mentioned above. To increase the efficacy of social protection programs in Zambia, the findings can be utilized to guide policy choices and program implementation.

2. Literature Review

The objective of the literature review on The Impact of Social Cash Transfer on Community Gender Dynamics in Zambia is to investigate how social cash transfer programs affect Zambian community resilience, access to education and healthcare, gender dynamics, and poverty reduction (Thomas et al. 2020). In terms of the research objectives discussed above, the literature review will pinpoint possibilities and problems related to Zambia's social cash transfer program implementation and make suggestions for better policy (Papaioannou et al. 2016). Insufficient financing and resource availability, ineffective targeting strategies, and restricted access to financial services are just a few of the issues that are highlighted in the brief. The factsheet also offers suggestions for boosting program execution, such as enhancing beneficiary engagement in income-generating activities, expanding program coverage, and improving targeting procedures (UNICEF 2022).

2.1 Empirical Review

2.1.1 Demographic Characteristics of Social Cash Transfer Recipients

Milimo et al. (2021) investigated the age, gender, educational attainment, and household composition of social cash transfer users in Zambia. According to the report, women made up the majority of those receiving social cash transfers, with households headed by women making up 75% of all households participating in the program (UNICEF 2022). The study also revealed that the majority of beneficiaries had poor levels of education, with only 22% having finished elementary school and 4% having completed secondary school or above (Handa et al. 2016).

2.1.2 Poverty Reduction and Economic Empowerment of Female-Headed Households

Numerous studies have been conducted on the effects of social cash transfers on the reduction of poverty and the economic empowerment of households with female heads in Zambia. According to Chowa et al. (2014), social cash transfers in Zambia affected households with female heads' economic empowerment. According to the study, social cash transfers raised household income, consumption, and asset ownership, which had a favorable effect on the economic empowerment of households headed by women (Nanziri 2020).

2.1.3 Gender Dynamics in Community Decision-Making Processes and Power Distribution

It has also been extensively researched how gender dynamics in local decision-making processes and power distribution are affected by social cash transfers. Tannenbaum et al. (2016) study looked at how social cash transfers affected gender relations in Zambia. According to the study, social cash transfers had favorable effects on gender dynamics, increasing women's participation in decision-making and lowering gender-based violence. The analysis also revealed that the program had helped to change gender stereotypes and advance gender equality (UNICEF 2022).

2.1.4 Access to Education and Healthcare Services for Children

It has also been investigated how social financial transfers affect children's access to healthcare and educational opportunities, particularly for girls. Handa et al. (2016) study looked at how social cash transfers affected the health and educational results of kids in Zambia. According to the study, social cash transfers had a favorable effect on young people's decision to enroll in and attend school, particularly on girls (Parsons et al. 2015). The study also shows that the program has improved child health outcomes, such as lowering child morbidity and death.

2.1.5 Social and Environmental Impacts on Community Well-being and Resilience

It has also been investigated how social cash transfers affect community resilience and well-being on both a social and environmental level. Ager (2013) study looked at how social cash transfers affected community resilience in Zambia. According to the study, social cash transfers enhanced household food security decreased social exclusion, and promoted sustainable livelihoods by involving recipients in income-generating activities (Lipper et al. 2017). These effects on community resilience were shown to be beneficial.

2.1.6 Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Improvements

Finally, the literature has pointed out various difficulties and chances related to the implementation of social cash transfer programs in Zambia. UNICEF (2022) looked at the potential and problems that Zambian social cash transfer programs face.

2.2 Theoretical Review

Programs for social cash transfers have grown in popularity as a way to combat poverty and provide for social safety, especially in low- and middle-income nations, mainly Zambia (UNICEF 2022). These initiatives give poor and vulnerable households recurring cash distributions with the goal of enhancing household welfare and fostering social inclusion. The capacities approach, the gender and development method, and the social protection approach are a few theoretical frameworks that can be used to analyze the effects of social cash transfer programs (Anfara Jr and Mertz 2014).

2.2.1 Capabilities Approach

Amartya Sen, an economist, established the capabilities approach, which emphasizes the value of increasing people's capacities and opportunities to lead fulfilling lives (Dang 2014). This method of thinking asserts that poverty isn't just a lack of money or material resources, but also a lack of access to fundamental freedoms like social interaction, education, and health. By giving recipients regular cash payments that can be used to buy essential products and services, social cash transfer programs can be considered as a way to improve people's capacity (Teece 2019)

2.2.2 Gender and Development Approach

The gender and development approach focuses on the connection between gender and poverty. This strategy acknowledges that gender disparities can exacerbate poverty and that poverty affects men and women differently (Momsen 2019). By giving regular cash transfers to households with female heads or by encouraging gender equality in program design and implementation, social cash transfer programs can be considered as a way to combat gender inequities.

2.2.3 Social Protection Approach

According to the social protection approach, social cash transfer programs are a component of a larger system of social protection that offers a safety net for the weak and disadvantaged (Ulriksen and Plagerson 2014). This strategy acknowledges that social and economic systems that restrict people's access to opportunities and resources also contribute to poverty and vulnerability. Social cash transfer programs can be seen as a way to lessen the effects of structural inequality by giving people who are most in needs regular cash payments (Mahendru and Tasker 2020).

2.2.4 Importance of targeting, regular payments, program design, and monitoring and evaluation

Programs for social cash transfers that are aimed at the poor and vulnerable are the most successful. It is crucial to make sure that people who are most in need receive the benefits of the program, and targeting can be done based on income, assets, or other criteria. Social cash transfer programs work best when they offer consistent, predictable payments that may be utilized to cover essential expenses (Markiewicz and Patrick 2015). Regular payments can ease consumption and lower the likelihood of relapsing into poverty. Social cash transfer programs work best when they are created with the target population's needs and preferences in mind. This includes factors like qualifying requirements, payment frequency, and payment size. Programs for social cash transfers work best when they are monitored and assessed to make sure they are accomplishing what they were designed to (Bastagli et al. 2016). This involves keeping an eye on how the program is targeted, how much and how often payments are made, and how the program affects household welfare.

2.3 Research Gap

The body of research on the effects of social cash transfer programs is expanding, but there are still a number of research gaps that need to be filled. The need for more thorough impact assessments that employ experimental or quasi-experimental techniques to calculate the causal impact of social cash transfer programs is a significant research need (Müller-Bloch and Kranz 2015). A number of impact analyses of social cash transfer programs have been conducted, but many of these studies contain methodological flaws such as small sample sizes, non-random assignment to treatment and control groups, and brief follow-up times. To offer stronger evidence of the effects of social cash transfer programs on poverty reduction, gender dynamics, and other outcomes of interest, more thorough impact evaluations are required (Müller-Bloch and Kranz 2015). The need for greater study on the long-term effects of social cash transfer programs represents another research gap. 

3. Research Design

The research design for a primary qualitative proposal on the topic, The Impact of Social Cash Transfer on Community Gender Dynamics in Zambia, is selected as an exploratory design. Exploratory research aims to gain a deeper understanding of a research problem, This research design also focuses on generating hypotheses for future research (Dannels 2018). In this case, the selected research design will explore the impact of social cash transfer on community gender dynamics in Zambia.

3.1 Type of Research Design

In terms of the selected exploratory research design, the type of design is selected as the case study design. The exploratory case study design is considered a research method that analyzes a particular area within a real-life context. In terms of the overall research study, this area is the impact of social case transfer on community gender dynamics and the real-life context in Zambia (Abbott and McKinney 2013). The type of exploratory design is perfect for the overall research because it allows the researcher to do in-depth research regarding the selected area of the research through the utilization of multiple methods of data collection, such as in-depth interviews, etc. (Sreejesh et al. 2014). In terms of qualitative research, the case study design is useful for exploring the social cash transfer experiences of the recipients in the country, of Zambia, and how the transfers impact the community gender dynamics. The qualitative research methodology also allows for the exploration of the cultural, social, and economic context that shapes the above-discussed experiences of the recipients in Zambia (Abbott and McKinney 2013).

3.1.1 Justification for the Type of research design

The exploratory case study-based design is the appropriate type of research design for this research study because of the following reasons:

1. Limited existing research: There is limited or less existing research regarding the research study topic. Therefore, the exploratory research design is suitable for gaining a deeper understanding of the research problem (Sreejesh et al. 2014). This type of research design is also useful for generating hypotheses for future research.
2. Complex research problem: The impact of social case transfer on community gender dynamics is a highly complex research problem that requires an in-depth understanding of the main aspects of the concerned area (Sreejesh et al. 2014). The selected research design is suitable in this case as it allows the researcher to gain a comprehensive understanding including the key areas of the research problem that imposes the influences on the overall research.
3. Requirement for a flexible approach: The exploratory research provides the researcher with the flexibility for decision-making regarding the approaches to data collection and analysis (Erickson 2017). The utilization of multiple methods of data collection and an open-ended approach enables the researcher to explore the research problem effectively so that useful insights can be generated that may not be possible with any other research design.
4. Context-specific research: Exploratory research is useful for context-specific research. The case study design utilized for this research study allows the researcher for an in-depth exploration of the research area in a real-life context (Erickson 2017).

3.2 Type of study to be undertaken

For the primary qualitative research, the qualitative primary research study is selected for this research. The qualitative research study is concerned with non-numerical data and focuses on what, why, when, etc. regarding the research problem (Khan 2014).

3.2.1 Justification for chosen study type

The qualitative study is selected for this research study because of the following reasons:

1. Emphasizes understanding experiences: Qualitative research study aims at understanding the perceptions, experiences, and perspectives of individuals in their natural environments. In terms of this research study, how social cash transfers impacted gender dynamics will be explored (Fletcher 2017).
2. Open-ended and flexible approach: Qualitative research is the most suitable study method that allows the researcher for an open-ended and flexible strategy for the purpose of data collection and analysis (Khan 2014). The utilization of in-depth interviews allows the researchers for a more detailed review of the research problem, along with generating useful insights with a more structured approach. 
3. Exploration of contextual factors: Qualitative research is useful for exploring the cultural, social, and economic context that shapes the experiences of the social cash transfer of the recipients in Zambia. This also helps in providing a comprehensive understanding to the researcher regarding the research phenomenon.
4. Rich and detailed data: Qualitative research offers detailed and rich data on the individual’s experiences (Fletcher 2017). The use of open-ended questions in the methods of data collection allows for a more detailed or in-depth analysis of the research problem.

3.3 Study population

Assessing a set audience in a research study is highly crucial despite selecting all other elements for the research. The procedure of selecting participants for the study among the prospective individuals is termed sampling which is focused to limit the quantity of the data that is required to be collected for the research study (Garg 2016). For this research study, 15 participants are finalized for the purpose of taking face-to-face interviews.

3.3.1 Justification for the study population

The study population selected 15 participants because of the following reasons:

1. Saves time: The small size of the population is effective for saving time and results in effective and efficient research.
2. Fewer chances of errors: With the small size of the population, there are fewer chances of errors in the collection of the data and it is also easier to manage the formalities required for a small size of the population such as getting a consent form and personal details, etc. (Garg 2016).

3.4 Sample Size and sampling procedure

There are two types of sampling, probability, and non-probability sampling. This research study will be based on the sample size of 15 participants as discussed above, and non-probability sampling, of which the type is selected as the quota sampling method (Berndt 2020). The quota sampling method is selected for the research study because 15 participants in total are finalized, of which 3 participants each belong to the 5 different wards of the Kasenengwa district of Zambia and are divided into sub-groups.

3.4.1 Justification for sample size and sampling procedure

The quota non-probability sampling is selected for this qualitative primary research study because of the following reasons:

1. Quick and easy: Quota sampling is useful in saving time for the data collection because the sample is representative of the population of interest. It is a straightforward, quick, and convenient form to sample the data (Vehovar et al. 2016).
2. Cost-effective method: Quota sampling is one of the cost-effective methods because of the usage of fewer quotas to represent the whole population rather than sampling every individual from a large population (Vehovar et al. 2016).
3. Representative of target population: The purpose of the selected sampling is to replicate the population of interest. With the use of this sampling method, the researcher aims at forming a sample that effectively represents the characteristics of the population.

3.5 Data Collection Methods

For this research study, the primary method is selected as the data collection method among the two major methods of data collection. In the research process, a data collection method plays a huge role as it determines the accuracy and quality of the collected data (Flick 2017). The primary data collection method determines that the data is valid, reliable, and relevant. It also helps to reduce bias and increase the representativeness of the sample.

3.5.1 Justification of Data Collection Method

The primary data collection method is selected for the research study due to the following reasons:

1. Focuses on the specific research question: The primary data collection method focuses on the research question rather than focusing on the second-hand data which was originally collected for some other purpose (Mwita 2022).
2. Provides specific results: The primary data collection method provides specific results rather than generalized results that are provided by the secondary method of data collection (Mwita 2022).

3.6 Data collection tools and techniques to be applied

For this research study, an interview is selected as a data collection tool and technique. An interview is a form of qualitative research that especially relies on asking questions from the selected sample size for the purpose of collecting the data. The interview can involve two or more people, one of whom is the interviewer asking the questions (Alshenqeeti 2014). This research will involve face-to-face interviews with the selected respondents. The responses will be noted down by the interviewer.

3.6.1 Justification for data collection tools and Techniques to be Applied

The interview is selected as the method of data collection for this research study because of the following reasons:

1. In-depth exploration: Face-to-face interviews allow the researcher to explore the research problem effectively. This type of data collection method offers an opportunity for the researcher to review the overall perceptions, and experiences of the social cash transfer recipients in Zambia and how the transfers have impacted the community gender dynamics (Peters. and Halcomb 2015).
2. Rapport building: The selected data collection method also allows for rapport-building between the researcher and the interviewee. This is considered crucial for qualitative research, where the researcher aims at understanding the experiences of the interviewee (Alshenqeeti 2014). Building rapport creates a conducive environment for the interviewee to share their experiences and opinions.
3. Flexible and open-ended approach: The interviews allow the researcher to use a flexible and open-ended approach for collecting the data.

Overall, face-to-face interviews are an appropriate data collection method for the primary qualitative proposal on the topic, The Impact of Social Cash Transfer on Community Gender Dynamics in Zambia, due to its in-depth exploration, flexible and open-ended approach, and rapport-building.

3.7. Data Analysis

Data analysis is concerned with the classification, investigation, and remix of the collected data for the purpose of addressing the starting suppositions. It also has the ability to produce compelling conclusions (Castleberry and Nolen 2018). Data analysis is crucial for both qualitative and quantitative research. In terms of the concerned research study, thematic analysis is selected for the purpose of data analysis.

3.7.1 Justification for data analysis approach was chosen

Thematic analysis will be applied to the concerned research study because of the following reasons.

1. Useful for Interviews: Thematic analysis is a method of analyzing qualitative data. It is usually applied to a set of texts, such as transcripts and interviews.
2. Identify the common ideas, topics, and patterns: The researcher closely assesses the collected data to identify the common topics, ideas, and patterns of meaning that come up repeatedly (Clarke et al. 2015).

4. Ethical considerations

The ethical considerations regarding the research study are described below.

1. Optional participation: Participants will be free to opt out of the study at any time.
2. Informed consent: Participants, who are involved in the research study must know the benefits, risks, and funding behind the study before they decline or agree to join (Steffen 2016).
3. Confidentiality: The researcher is aware of the participants but the information will be kept hidden regarding them from everyone else for maintaining confidentiality.

5. Possible study limitations

The possible study limitations are described below.

1. Difficult to investigate causality: It is complex to explain the difference in the quality and quantity of the gathered data in a qualitative research study and reaching at the desired outcomes (Köhler et al. 2022).
2. No verification of result in the qualitative research: A qualitative study is mostly open-ended, where participants are free and have control over the content of the collected information (Köhler et al. 2022). Due to this, it becomes difficult for the researcher to verify the results against the scenarios described or shared by the participants of the study.

6. References

Abbott, M.L. and McKinney, J., 2013. Understanding and applying research design. John Wiley & Sons.

Ager, A., 2013. Annual Research Review: Resilience and child well‐being–public policy implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(4), pp.488-500.

Alshenqeeti, H., 2014. Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), pp.39-45.

Anfara Jr, V.A. and Mertz, N.T. eds., 2014. Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Sage publications.

Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., Schmidt, T. and Pellerano, L., 2016. Cash transfers: what does the evidence say? A rigorous review of program impact and the role of design and implementation features. London: ODI, 1(7).

Berndt, A.E., 2020. Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), pp.224-226.

Castleberry, A. and Nolen, A., 2018. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 10(6), pp.807-815.

Chowa, G., Ansong, D. and Despard, M.R., 2014. Financial capabilities: Multilevel modeling of the impact of internal and external capabilities of rural households. Social Work Research, 38(1), pp.19-35.

Clarke, V., Braun, V. and Hayfield, N., 2015. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 3, pp.222-248.

Dake, F., Natali, L., Angeles, G., de Hoop, J., Handa, S., Peterman, A., and Malawi Cash Transfer Evaluation Team and the Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Team, 2018. Cash transfers, early marriage, and fertility in Malawi and Zambia. Studies in family planning, 49(4), pp.295-317.

Dang, A.T., 2014. Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: A Framework for well-being evaluation and policy analysis? Review of social economy, 72(4), pp.460-484.

Dannels, S.A., 2018. Research design. In The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences, pp. 402-416. Routledge.

De Hoop, J., Groppo, V. and Handa, S., 2020. Cash transfers, microentrepreneurial activity, and child work: Evidence from Malawi and Zambia. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(3), pp.670-697.

Doody, O. and Bailey, M.E., 2016. Setting a research question, aim, and objective. Nurse researcher, 23(4).

Erickson, G.S., 2017. Exploratory research design. In New Methods of Market Research and Analysis, pp. 27-50. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Fletcher, A.J., 2017. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. International Journal of social research methodology, 20(2), pp.181-194.

Flick, U. ed., 2017. The Sage Handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage.

Garg, R., 2016. Methodology for research I. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), p.640.

Handa, S., Peterman, A., Seidenfeld, D. and Tembo, G., 2016. Income transfers and maternal health: evidence from a national randomized social cash transfer program in Zambia. Health Economics, 25(2), pp.225-236.

Khan, S.N., 2014. Qualitative research method: Grounded theory. International journal of business and management, 9(11), pp.224-233.

Köhler, T., Smith, A. and Bhakoo, V., 2022. Templates in qualitative research methods: Origins, limitations, and new directions. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), pp.183-210.

Lipper, L., McCarthy, N., Zilberman, D., Asfaw, S. and Branca, G., 2017. Climate-smart agriculture: building resilience to climate change, p. 630. Springer Nature.

Mahendru, R. and Tasker, M., 2020. Mixed-method approaches in child-sensitive social protection evaluations: The promises and pitfalls. Global Social Policy, 20(1), pp.10-14.

Markiewicz, A. and Patrick, I., 2015. Developing monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Sage Publications.

Michelo, S., 2015. Social Cash Transfer Scale-up for Zambia. One Pager, 287.

Milimo, J., Zulu, J.M., Svanemyr, J., Munsaka, E., Mweemba, O. and Sandøy, I.F., 2021. Economic support, education, and sexual decision making among female adolescents in Zambia: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), pp.1-8.

Milner, N., Taylor, B., Allen, S., Bamforth, M., Conneller, C., Croft, S., French, C., Hadley, P., Knight, B., Little, A. and Panter, I., 2018. Methods: Aims, and objectives.

Momsen, J., 2019. Gender and development. Routledge.

Müller-Bloch, C. and Kranz, J., 2015. A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews.

Mwita, K., 2022. Factors to consider when choosing data collection methods. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(5), pp.532-538.

Nanziri, L.E., 2020. Women, Inclusive Finance and the Quality of Life: Evidence from Zambia. Women and Sustainable Human Development: Empowering Women in Africa, pp.285-303.

Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A. and Booth, A., 2016. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review, pp.1-336.

Parsons, J.A., Bond, V.A. and Nixon, S.A., 2015. ‘Are we not human?’Stories of stigma, disability, and HIV from Lusaka, Zambia, and their implications for access to health services. PloS one, 10(6), p.e0127392.

Peters, D.H., Adam, T., Alonge, O., Agyepong, I.A. and Tran, N., 2013. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. Business Management Journal, 347.

Peters, K. and Halcomb, E., 2015. Interviews in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher (2014+), 22(4), p.6.

Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S., Anusree, M.R., Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S. and Anusree, M.R., 2014. Business research design: Exploratory, descriptive, and causal designs. Business research methods: An applied orientation, pp.25-103.

Steffen, E., 2016. Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Analyzing qualitative data in psychology, 2, pp.31-44.

Tannenbaum, C., Greaves, L. and Graham, I.D., 2016. Why sex and gender matter in implementation research. BMC medical research methodology, 16(1), pp.1-9.

Teece, D.J., 2019. A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 53(1), pp.1-43.

Thomas, J., Utley, J., Hong, S.Y., Korkmaz, H. and Nugent, G., 2020. A Review of the Research. Handbook of Research on STEM Education.

Ulriksen, M.S. and Plagerson, S., 2014. Social protection: Rethinking rights and duties. World Development, 64, pp.755-765.

UNICEF, 2022. Social Case Transfore Factsheet. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/zambia/media/2571/file/Zambia-SCT-factsheet-2022.pdf (Accessed on 2 May 2023).

Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V. and Steinmetz, S., 2016. Non-probability sampling, 1, pp. 329-45. The Sage Handbook of survey methods.

You Might Also Like:

Social Research Assignment Help

How Do Social Economy Inequalities Impact Mental health?

Social and Economic Environment Assessment Answer