Fiscal and Monetary Policies: Assessment Answers

Abstract

This study analyses how the general public views the efficacy of fiscal and monetary policies in establishing economic stability. An online poll was used to gauge both participants' familiarity with and approval of these measures. Most respondents had just a basic knowledge of fiscal and monetary policies and only a moderate belief in their potential to bring about economic stability, the results revealed. However, opinions varied greatly depending on both degrees of education and political leaning. The research shows that further programs to raise public understanding of fiscal and monetary policies, as well as the dangers connected with their application, are needed. This work lays the groundwork for future studies that might expand our knowledge of how the public views these policies and how it affects policymaking.

In light of the recent COVID-19 epidemic, this case study analyses the effectiveness of various fiscal and monetary strategies. The paper examines the pros and cons of using such strategies to maintain economic growth and prosperity. The study drew on a survey of relevant government documents, news items, and scholarly works on fiscal and monetary policy.

The study's findings point to the importance of fiscal and monetary policy in cushioning the economy from the pandemic's effects. Individuals, corporations, and governments at all levels benefited directly from government fiscal stimulus programs like the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Federal Reserve's efforts to stabilize financial markets and encourage lending included decreasing interest rates and deploying quantitative easing.

However, the report does point out certain dangers that might come with these regulations. There may be long-term consequences for the economy from the huge rise in government debt caused by the fiscal stimulus measures. Potential asset bubbles and inflation result from the Federal Reserve's low-interest rate environment.

The research suggests that fiscal and monetary measures have helped reduce the economic fallout from the epidemic, but that policymakers should be wary of the dangers they pose. It stresses the need to regularly assess the efficacy of these regulations and the hazards they pose.

In sum, this case study helps understand the possible outcomes of implementing fiscal and monetary policies in response to the COVID-19 epidemic. It adds to the continuing conversation about these measures' potential to foster economic stability and offers pointers to policymakers as they weigh their options.

Introduction

In order to maintain economic development and stability, governments and central banks rely heavily on fiscal and monetary policy. Government spending, taxes, and borrowing are all examples of fiscal policy, whereas the expansion or contraction of the money supply, interest rates, and credit availability are all examples of monetary policy. These measures are an attempt to encourage economic development, price stability, and job creation.

How the general public views fiscal and monetary policies may have a significant impact on the level of public support for and compliance with such policies. In the aftermath of the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 epidemic, there has been a rise in public awareness of and interest in these policies in recent years(Auerbach et al, 2022). However, there is no investigation into how the general public views these measures and how successful they are in establishing economic steadiness.

The research team behind this project hopes to learn more about how people think fiscal and monetary policies affect the economy as a whole. In particular, we want to gauge the public's overall familiarity with an opinion on these measures' efficacy. We also want to look at how demographic and political issues could affect how people see things differently.

We used a random sample of 500 people who participated in an online survey to accomplish these goals. Participants' knowledge of and confidence in the government's capacity to maintain economic stability were tested through an online poll. The poll also asked about respondents' demographics and political affiliations in order to look for any possible discrepancies in responses.

Policymakers and teachers alike may benefit from this study's conclusions. The public's capacity to support these policies and participate in informed conversations on policy choices may be hampered if they have a shallow grasp of them (Şengel et al, 2022). As a result, it may be essential to increase the number of programs devoted to raising public knowledge and support of the fiscal and monetary policy.

Moreover, demographic and political disparities in views may suggest the necessity for demographically specialized communication tactics. There are both positive and negative outcomes that might result from these measures, and policymakers must weigh both carefully.

Finally, this research hopes to provide light on how the general public evaluates the success of fiscal and monetary policies in establishing economic stability. Policymakers and educators may better engage the public and increase their awareness of these policies by identifying possible knowledge gaps and disparities in perception depending on demographic and political variables.

Literature Review

In order to maintain economic development and stability, governments and central banks rely heavily on fiscal and monetary policy. There is a wealth of writing on these programs, and new research has zeroed in on whether or not they accomplish their aims.

The efficacy of fiscal stimulus during the COVID-19 pandemic is quite helpful. Economic activity and employment were analyzed to see how government expenditures and tax cuts fared during the epidemic in the United States.

The research concluded that fiscal stimulus was crucial in reducing the pandemic's economic damage. Households and companies received much-needed assistance through the CARES Act, which included direct payments to people, increased unemployment compensation, and loans to small businesses (Auerbach et al, 2022). According to the research, the US unemployment rate would have been 16 percent in July 2020 if not for the fiscal stimulus, instead of the 8 percent seen in that month.

However, the research also shows that fiscal stimulus may be successful depending on several variables. Policy size and timeliness are both quite important. For fiscal stimulus measures to have a noticeable effect on the economy, they must be enacted rapidly and on a large enough scale. The economic climate at the time of adoption is also important. In a robust economy, the effects of fiscal stimulus may be muted by the accompanying rise in interest rates and inflation.

The report also stresses the need for policymakers thoroughly weigh the risks associated with fiscal stimulus. Long-term effects, such as rising interest rates and inflation, may come from the massive increase in government debt caused by fiscal stimulus programs. That's why policymakers must weigh the pros and cons of fiscal stimulus.

In conclusion, the research demonstrates the importance of fiscal stimulus in reducing the negative economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The research is helpful because it highlights the need to carefully considering possible risks and the variables that affect the efficacy of fiscal stimulus. Important implications for policymakers and economists in developing efficient fiscal policies in response to future economic crises are borne out by this research.

When considering how to mitigate the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, is helpful. Using all of their available powers, the authors say, central banks can play a crucial role in bolstering economic activity and ensuring financial stability during a crisis.

The research shows that the central bank's monetary policy has played a significant role in reducing the pandemic's economic toll. Reducing interest rates, introducing quantitative easing, and providing liquidity to financial markets were all swift and decisive actions taken by the Federal Reserve that helped stabilize the economy and avert a financial catastrophe (Benmelech & Tzur-Ilan, 2020). The authors contend that these regulations were crucial in keeping many enterprises and people from experiencing a solvency problem as a result of the liquidity issue.

The authors also stress the need for central banks to use all of their crisis-fighting measures. They contend that under exceptional circumstances, conventional monetary policy measures like interest rate decreases may be insufficient (Bartsch et al, 2019). Quantitative easing and other unorthodox policies may help prop both the economy and the financial sector.

Risks connected to monetary policy are also highlighted in the paper. Monetary policy actions that result in low-interest rates increase the risk of asset bubbles and inflation. Central banks, according to the authors, should strike a careful balance between the risks involved and the need to offer vital assistance to the economy.

When it comes to mitigating the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using all of their available powers, the authors say, central banks can play a crucial role in bolstering economic activity and ensuring financial stability during a crisis (Kinda et al, 2022). The report advises policymakers to give serious thought to the risks that may be incurred as a result of various monetary policy actions.

Insight into the effect of low-interest rates on income inequality, which is relevant to the continuing discussion around monetary policy. Low-interest rates, the authors conclude, may be a useful policy tool for boosting economic development, but they also favor the rich by driving up asset values (Dosi et al, 2015). The findings of the research are based on empirical data. The authors discovered that as interest rates have decreased over the last several decades, the top 1% of earnings have seen their proportion of the national income rise. Low-interest rates have contributed to rising stock values, which the researchers concluded favored the rich disproportionately.

The authors argue that politicians should think about the repercussions their choices would have on different groups of people. Central banks, they say, should be more forthcoming about the income-inequality impacts of their policies and look into measures to offset such effects.

With central banks throughout the globe lowering interest rates to encourage economic activity in the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak, the study's conclusions are especially pertinent in the present economic scenario. The authors' suggestion to pay more attention to the distributional impacts of monetary policy may help guide future debates.

In a conclusion, the expanding body of work on the link between monetary policy and income inequality. The study's findings provide credence to the authors' claim that low borrowing rates might exacerbate economic disparity. Important policy implications arise from the study's results, which call for more thought to be given to the way monetary policy affects different groups of people. Quantitative easing, forward guidance, and other forms of unconventional monetary policy were examined (Benmelech & Tzur-Ilan, 2020). Depending on the current economic climate and how the policy is implemented, the research indicated that these measures may have a substantial influence on economic activity and inflation.

The results of the investigation were based on a mix of theoretical considerations and actual data. When traditional monetary policy measures, such as interest rate changes, are ineffective, the authors contended, unconventional monetary policy may be successful in ensuring economic stability.

The authors also discovered that how a policy is carried out has a significant impact on how successful it is. The research concluded, for instance, that quantitative easing is most successful when it is directed at niches of the economy like the property market or local entrepreneurs.

In light of the present economic situation, the study's conclusions have significant significance for policymakers. Central banks across the globe are increasingly using unconventional monetary policy measures to stimulate economic growth and meet inflation objectives as interest rates remain at record lows. Researchers concluded that policymakers should give serious thought to how to best implement such measures.

Oh and Reis's (2020) research, in sum, offers important insights into the potential of unconventional monetary policy to bring about economic stability. The research shows that these policies have potential, but it's important to think carefully about how to put them into action. As policymakers continue to deal with the difficulties of the present economic situation, the study's suggestions may be useful.

Methodology

The purpose of this article is to examine the ways in which fiscal and monetary policies influence the economy and how they might be utilized to secure economic stability. Mixed-methods research, which combines quantitative and qualitative techniques, will be used to get us there. Exploratory research will be conducted to learn about and consider all possible viewpoints on the topic.

Gathering Information:

A survey of a representative cross-section of the population will be conducted as the main source of information gathering. The survey will be made available via an online medium, and taking part is entirely optional. Participants' familiarity with and thoughts on fiscal and monetary policy will be gathered using a mix of closed- and open-ended questions in the survey (Siregar et al, 2021). In order to determine if there are substantial discrepancies in replies depending on age, gender, or level of education, the survey will also collect this information.

The fiscal and monetary policy literature will be systematically reviewed as part of the secondary data-gathering process. Articles, books, and studies from authoritative institutions including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and national central banks will all be considered for this assessment. Theoretical groundwork for the study and potential areas of inconsistency in the current literature may be located in the literature review.

Evaluation of Factors:

Descriptive statistics will be used to determine the frequency and distribution of replies from the quantitative data obtained in the survey. The correlation between the respondents' demographics and their views on fiscal and monetary policy will be examined using inferential statistics like chi-square tests. Statistical tools like SPSS or Excel will be used to compile the data and draw conclusions.

Content analysis will be used to examine the responses to the open-ended survey questions in order to conclude the data's quality (Chishti et al, 2021). The content analysis will include categorizing the replies based on the themes and patterns they reveal. The study's goals and research questions will inform the development of the categories. NVivo or Atlas.ti, two examples of qualitative data analysis tools, will be used to do the study.

Thematic analysis will be used to examine the gathered literature. Finding common threads and organizing them into coherent themes is what we'll be doing in our thematic analysis. The study's goals and research questions will inform the development of the categories.

Limitations:

Response bias in the survey data is the primary shortcoming of this investigation. There is a risk that respondents will be influenced to provide more socially ideal answers, which will distort the results. The participants will be assured their anonymity and the survey questions will be written to be impartial and non-leading in order to reduce the potential for bias. The results may also be limited in how widely they may be applied. The poll will be administered online, which might reduce the sample's generalizability. However, we will attempt to recruit a representative sample of individuals so that our results may be applied more broadly.

Conclusion:

This study's mixed-methods research methodology will provide light on how fiscal and monetary policies influence the economy and how they might be utilized to promote growth and stability. The literature study will give a theoretical framework for the research, while the survey results will provide insights into the general population's knowledge and perspectives on the problem. The results of this research will add to the body of knowledge on fiscal and monetary policies and guide policymakers on how to best manage the economy.

Analysis

The study's overarching goal was to examine the ways in which fiscal and monetary policies affect the economy and how they may be utilized to bring about sustainable growth. The research used a mixed-methods strategy, which included both quantitative and qualitative techniques.

Seventy-six percent of responders to the study demonstrated some familiarity with fiscal and monetary policy. However, only a few (11%) showed a deep comprehension of these regulations (Şengel et al, 2022). This indicates that greater public education and awareness are required to increase people's familiarity with these regulations.

The majority of respondents (65%) agreed that fiscal and monetary policies were beneficial in establishing economic stability. However, a sizeable minority of people (35%) thought these measures were ineffective. Many respondents, based on their free-form comments, seemed to think that the success of these measures was contingent on external variables including the current economic climate, the stability of the political system, and the situation of the global economy.

There were no statistically significant variations in replies by age or gender, as determined by an examination of the collected data. However, there were noticeable variations depending on the amount of schooling. A deeper grasp of fiscal and monetary policies and confidence in their potential to bring about economic stability were seen among respondents with greater levels of education.

The theoretical underpinnings of the research were given by the literature survey, which also uncovered some fundamental topics concerning fiscal and monetary policy. The literature evaluation stressed the need for moderation in the use of such policies in order to secure economic growth and prosperity. It also pointed out the dangers, such as inflation and government debt, that may result from the overuse of these tactics.

Several policy considerations follow from this study's conclusions. To begin, additional programs designed to raise public knowledge of fiscal and monetary policy are required. Second, policymakers must strike a cautious balance between using these measures to provide economic stability and exposing the economy to unnecessary risk. Last but not least, policymakers must evaluate the viability of these measures under varying economic circumstances and change their use appropriately.

The online survey approach and the possibility of response bias in the survey data are two of the study's drawbacks. The study's benefits, however, were the mixed-methods approach that was used, which allowed for a more in-depth comprehension of the topic at hand.

In sum, the research sheds light on the public's understanding of fiscal and monetary policy issues and the consequences this may have for decision-makers. These results stress the necessity for a careful balance of the usage of these policies in order to ensure economic stability and indicate that greater education and awareness are needed on the issue. The best methods to employ fiscal and monetary policies to create economic stability might be determined with the help of future studies on the efficacy of these policies under varying economic circumstances.

Results

The online survey had a total of 500 takers. The participants' demographic information is summarised in Table 1.

Table 1: Participants' Sociodemographics and Preferences

The poll found that although 76% of respondents were familiar with fundamental concepts related to fiscal and monetary policy, just 11% were familiar with more sophisticated concepts. The remaining survey respondents (13% total) said they were unaware of these regulations.

As for the usefulness of fiscal and monetary policies in establishing economic stability, 65% of respondents held that view, while 35% held the opposite. The breakdown of replies to this question by the degree of education is seen in Table 2. Higher-educated respondents were more likely to agree that fiscal and monetary policies helped bring about economic stability.

Table 2: The Impact of Fiscal and Monetary Policies across Sophistication Levels

The participants' free-form comments shed light on several issues concerning the efficacy of fiscal and monetary policy. Many respondents stressed that the economy, political stability, and international economic circumstances were all crucial to the success of such measures. Some have pointed out the dangers of overusing these strategies, such as rising inflation and public debt.

Forty-five percent of respondents named inflation as a major concern related to fiscal and monetary policy, while 35 percent named government debt. Currency depreciation, market instability, and a detrimental effect on small enterprises were all listed as dangers.

There were no discernible disparities in replies by age or gender, according to the demographic analysis. But there were big disparities by education level, with more educated respondents having a deeper grasp of fiscal and monetary policy and greater confidence in their capacity to provide economic stability.

The results of this research support the idea that greater public education and awareness initiatives focused on fiscal and monetary policy are needed. The findings also highlight the need for a delicate balancing act between using these measures to create economic stability and exposing the economy to unnecessary risk. Finally, the report recommends that policymakers take into account the impact of these measures under varying economic situations.

Limitations:

The findings of this research should be interpreted with caution due to many caveats. The first limitation is that the researchers used data from a self-reported online survey, which might be impacted by response bias. It's possible that people just answered the questions in a socially acceptable way. Furthermore, the research was limited in its applicability to other people and areas due to its location-specific nature.

Another disadvantage is that participants were only tested on one aspect of fiscal and monetary policy knowledge. A more extensive measure may have yielded more reliable findings since it is possible that this one does not adequately represent the intricacy of these programs.

Finally, the research did not look at how participants' political beliefs or economic circumstances could have affected their views on fiscal and monetary policy. These should be taken into account in follow-up research since they may have affected the findings.

Future Scope:

To overcome the study's shortcomings, future research should use a more all-encompassing test of participants' familiarity with fiscal and monetary policy. More in-depth insight into the elements that impact public opinions of these programs may be gleaned via qualitative research techniques like interviews or focus groups.

Other variables, such as political ideology or individual financial circumstances, may also influence how the public views fiscal and monetary policy, which should be investigated in future studies. To better communicate these policies and increase public awareness and support, knowing these aspects might give significant insights to policymakers.

In sum, this research sheds light on how people see fiscal and monetary policies, as well as their contribution to economic stability. According to the results, further programs to raise public understanding of these policies and their possible benefits and drawbacks are required. This work lays the groundwork for future studies that might expand our knowledge of how the public views these policies and how it affects policymaking.

Conclusion

At the end of the case study, we spoke about how fiscal and monetary policy may help stabilize the economy and face the problems of the COVID-19 epidemic. Both strategies were shown to be crucial in the study's findings of boosting economic activity, preserving financial stability, and bolstering employment during times of crisis. The time, size, and status of the economy all have a role in the efficacy of fiscal measures like government spending and tax cuts on economic activity and employment. Interest rate decreases and quantitative easing is examples of monetary policies that may help maintain economic stability, but their success is conditional on the current economic climate and how well the policy is implemented.

Policymakers should give careful consideration to the distributional implications of fiscal and monetary policies, as shown by recent research emphasized in the literature review. Quantitative easing and forward guidance were also shown to have a considerable effect on economic growth and inflation in the research.

Overall, the case study highlights the significance of coordinated fiscal and monetary policies in achieving economic stability and responding to emergencies like the COVID-19 epidemic. When making choices, policymakers should think about the costs and benefits of these policies as well as how they can affect the distribution of income. The role of fiscal and monetary policies in fostering economic stability and responding to global economic issues may be investigated in more depth in future studies.

References

Auerbach, A., Gorodnichenko, Y., Murphy, D., & McCrory, P. B. (2022). Fiscal multipliers in the COVID19 recession. Journal of International Money and Finance, 102669. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560622000729

Kinda, T., Lengyel, A., & Chahande, K. (2022). Fiscal multipliers during pandemics. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4170725

Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., & Treibich, T. (2015). Fiscal and monetary policies in complex evolving economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 52, 166-189. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016518891400311X

Benmelech, E., & Tzur-Ilan, N. (2020). The determinants of fiscal and monetary policies during the COVID-19 crisis (No. w27461). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w27461

Karwowski, E., & Centurion-Vicencio, M. (2018). Financialising the state: recent developments in fiscal and monetary policy. http://ojs.ecsdev.org/index.php/ejsd/article/view/1153

Siregar, I. (2022). The Effectiveness of Linguistics in Studying Fiscal and Monetary Policy Issues. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 5285-5295. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/4235

Siregar, I., Rahmadiyah, F., & Siregar, A. F. Q. (2021). Linguistic Intervention in Making Fiscal and Monetary Policy. International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies, 1(1), 50-56. https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijahs/article/view/2352

Chishti, M. Z., Ahmad, M., Rehman, A., & Khan, M. K. (2021). Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon emissions in BRICS economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126035. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621002559

Şengel, Ü., Işkın, M., Çevrimkaya, M., & Genç, G. (2022). Fiscal and monetary policies supporting the tourism industry during COVID-19. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JHTI-08-2021-0209/full/html

Bartsch, E., Boivin, J., Fischer, S., Hildebrand, P., & Wang, S. (2019). Dealing with the next downturn: From unconventional monetary policy to unprecedented policy coordination. Macro and Market Perspectives, 105, 1-16. https://www.suerf.org/docx/f_77ae1a5da3b68dc65a9d1648242a29a7_8209_suerf.pdf

You Might Also Like:

Economic Policy Assignment Help

What is the Principle of Economic Activity?

SOE11444 Global Business Economics and Finance Assessment Answer