Introduction

A method of disaster risk reduction known as "community-driven disaster risk reduction (CDRR)" encourages communities to actively participate in identifying and mitigating disaster risks rather than relying solely on groups and professionals from outside the community. This system is overall broadly perceived as an effective method for limiting disaster outcomes, especially in weak networks (Yasui and Kayes, 2021). Despite the fact that disaster risk reduction has the potential to lessen the damage caused by disasters, there are several potential drawbacks and opportunities to keep in mind when putting this strategy into action.

Constraints

According to Yasui and Kayes, 2021, one of the most prominent concerns in deploying CDRR is a lack of resources. Communities may lack the financial or technical resources required to put risk-reduction measures in place. This can make long-term risk reduction measures difficult to continue. Another barrier is a lack of community understanding regarding catastrophe risks and risk-reduction strategies. Many communities may be unaware of the precise threats they face or how to mitigate them (Yasui and Kayes, 2021). This can make mobilising community members to take action difficult. Political concerns might also be a barrier to CDRR implementation. Risk-reduction strategies may be difficult to successfully implement due to political instability or corruption (Archer et al. 2016). Additionally, according to Kim, 2018, political authorities may limit funding and support for CDRR activities by prioritising other goals over disaster risk reduction. Inequality in society is another obstacle that could hinder the effectiveness of the CDRR. In many communities, disasters may disproportionately affect vulnerable populations like women, children, and the elderly (Kim, 2018). These gatherings may likewise have restricted admittance to assets and dynamic power, making it challenging for them to participate in risk-decreasing exercises.

Opportunities

According to Geekiyanage et al. 2020, CDRR permits networks to have a functioning part in distinguishing and moderating calamity chances. CDRR can assemble local area strength and limit calamity gambles by interfacing with local area individuals and empowering them to make a move. Communities' local knowledge can be used to identify and manage catastrophe risks (Geekiyanage et al. 2020). CDRR might assemble risk-decrease arrangements that are custom fitted to the singular necessities of every local area by utilising this data. Community members, government agencies, and other stakeholders can network at CDRR. By laying out these organisations, CDRR further develops joint effort and collaboration, which can be significant in a fiasco reaction (Van Niekerk et al. 2018). It can likewise support the coordination of hazard-decrease exercises into bigger advancement programs. Long-term catastrophe risk reduction strategies may benefit from CDRR. By encouraging communities to actively participate in risk reduction activities, CDRR may increase resilience and lessen the long-term effects of disasters. Both the capacity of the community to respond to future crises and the need for external assistance can be reduced as a result of this (Dobson, 2017). In addition to ensuring that disadvantaged groups are involved in risk-reduction activities, CDRR provides a chance to address social injustice. By connecting with these groups and ensuring that their viewpoints are taken into consideration, CDRR can assist in reducing the disproportionate impact of disasters on these groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, although implementing CDRR may be challenging, there are also opportunities to increase resilience and reduce catastrophe risks. Through interacting with communities, utilising local knowledge, developing networks, and encouraging sustainability, CDRR may be an efficient method for reducing disaster risk. Nonetheless, in order to overcome limits and maximise potential, it is critical to provide the required resources, create awareness, and address political factors that may restrict the effectiveness of CDRR activities.

References

Archer, D. (2016). Building urban climate resilience through community-driven approaches to development: Experiences from Asia. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. Retrieved from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2014-0035/full/html [Retrieved on 10.4.2023]

Dobson, S. (2017). Community-driven pathways for implementation of global urban resilience goals in Africa. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 26, 78-84. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420917302674 [Retrieved on 10.4.2023]

Geekiyanage, D., Fernando, T., & Keraminiyage, K. (2020). Assessing the state of the art in community engagement for participatory decision-making in disaster risk-sensitive urban development. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 51, 101847. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420920313492 [Retrieved on 10.4.2023]

Kim, S. J. (2018). Ethical Implications of the Sustainable Development Goals-Is Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction Community-Driven?-. 한국위기관리논집, 14(6), 51-64. Retrieved from: https://www.earticle.net/Article/A334915 [Retrieved on 10.4.2023]

Van Niekerk, D., Nemakonde, L. D., Kruger, L., & Forbes-Genade, K. (2018). Community-based disaster risk management. Handbook of disaster research, 411-429. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_20 [Retrieved on 10.4.2023]

Yasui, E., & Kayes, B. A. (2021). Community-driven disaster risk reduction: a case study of flood risk management in Brandon, MB, Canada. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 1-23. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07900627.2021.1999216 [Retrieved on 10.4.2023]

You Might Also Like

Disaster Management Assignment Help

401240 Risk Mitigation and Ethics for Australian Health Professionals Assessment Answer

DEM311: Emergency and Disaster Management in Context - Assessment Answer

Hey MAS, I need Assignment Sample of

Distinctive Advantage

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • 100% Plagiarism Free Content
  • 0% Use Of AI
  • Guaranteed On-Time Delivery
  • Confidential & Secure
  • Free Comprehensive Resources
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • PHD Level Experts

All-Inclusive Success Package

  • Plagiarism Report

    FREE $10.00
  • Non-AI Content Report

    FREE $9.00
  • Expert Session

    FREE $35.00
  • Topic Selection

    FREE $40.00
  • DOI Links

    FREE $25.00
  • Unlimited Revision

    FREE $75.00
  • Editing/Proofreading

    FREE $90.00
  • Bibliography Page

    FREE $25.00
  • Get Instant Quote

Enjoy HD Grade Assignments without overpayingSave More. Score Better. Bless YOU!

Order Now

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Get 50% + 20% EXTRAAADiscount on WhatsApp